Influence of mandibulotomy approaches on oral function following radical resection of tongue carcinoma / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#This study aimed to compare the influences of postoperative oral function in patients with median or paramedian mandibulotomy during the radical resection of tongue carcinoma and to provide evidence for the choice of osteotomy location for mandibulotomy.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 126 patients who underwent combined radical neck dissection with mandibulectomy and glossectomy followed by simultaneous reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the position of mandibulotomy: median mandibulotomy group (median group, n=60) and paramedian mandibulotomy group (paramedian group, n=66). The fourth edition of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) was used to compare the differences in oral functions, such as swallowing, mastication, and speech, between the two groups during regular follow-up. SPSS 24.0 software package was used for statistical analysis, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.@*RESULTS@#Six months after the operation, no significant differences in swallowing, mastication, and speech functions were found between the median and paramedian groups. However, the swallowing and speech functions in the paramedian group were better than those in the median group 1 year after the operation (P<0.05), whereas no statistical difference in mastication function was observed between the two groups.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Evaluation of the postoperative oral function results showed that paramedian mandibulotomy was a better surgical approach than median mandibulotomy. Paramedian mandibulotomy is worth prioritizing in the radical resection of tongue carcinoma.

Modified Mandibulotomy Technique to Reduce Postoperative Complications: 5-Year Results

PURPOSE: To review the 5-year outcomes of our modified mandibulotomy technique. Retrospective review of a tertiary level oral cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 5-year period, 30 patients who had a uniform surgical technique consisting of a lower lip-splitting, modified stair-step osteotomy with thin saw blade and osteotome after plate-precontouring and combination fixation with monocortical osteosynthesis (miniplate) and bicortical osteosynthesis (maxiplate and bicortical screws), with at least 14 months postoperative follow-up, were selected and reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 8 women and 22 men with an average age of 56.5 years. All the patients involved malignancies were squamous cell carcinoma. The main primary sites of the those who underwent a mandibulotomy were the tonsil, the base of tongue, the oral tongue, the retromolar pad area, and others. Others included buccal cheek, floor of mouth, and soft palate. 23 patients received postoperative radiation therapy, and among whom 8 patients also received chemotherapy. Total four (13%) mandibulotomy-related complications occurred, only two (6.7%) requiring additional operation under general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Our modified mandibulotomy meets the criteria for an ideal mandibulotomy technique relatively well because it requires no intermaxillary fixation, can precise preserve the occlusion in a precise way, allows early function, requires no secondary procedures, and has few complications.

Clinical Evaluation between Mandibulotomy and Mandible Sparing Approaches in Oropharyngeal Cancer Operation and Reconstruction

PURPOSE: Mandibulotomy approach and mandible sparing approach are most common methods for oropharyngeal cancer surgery. Good surgical view and convenience of flap inset are advantages of mandibulotomy approach but deformity of mandible contour, postoperative malocclusion and radionecrosis are its limitations. To make up for the limitations, mandible sparing method is commonly performed, but limited surgical view and difficulties of flap inset are the weak points of this approach. The purpose of the study is to compare mandibulotomy and mandible sparing approaches in postoperative complications and progression of the treatment in oropharyngeal cancer operation and reconstruction. METHODS: Single reconstructive microsurgeon operated for oropharyngeal cancer patients with different surgeons of head and neck department who prefer mandibulotomy and mandible sparing approach respectively, and we compared the frequency of postoperative complication, operation time, duration of hospitalization and recurrence rate between two different surgical approaches. RESULTS: Mandibulotomy approach was used in 18 patients and mandible sparing approach was used in 15 patients. In mandibulotomy approach, there happened one case of teeth injury and one case of necrosis of skin and gingiva, but there happened no malocclusion and radionecrosis. In mandible sparing approach, there were 3 cases of fistula and 2 cases of infection which are significantly higher than mandibulotomy approach. There were no significant differences between early regional recurrence and duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: In this study we compared two different methods for the surgical approach in oropharyngeal cancer surgery. As mandible sparing approach has difficulties of limited surgical view, it can be used for the limited indications of anterior tongue and mouth floor cancer. Mandibulotomy approach has advantages of good surgical view and convenience of flap inset. In this method preservation of gingival tissue, watertight fashion suture, delicate osteotomy and plate fixation to maintain occlusion are the key points for the successful results.

Midline Mandibulotomy: Functional Outcomes / 대한이비인후과학회지

BACKGROUND: Although the oncologic validity and perioperative complications of midline mandibulotomy are well described, little attention has been directed toward the functional problems that may be associated with its use. METHOD: A retrospective evaluation of 14 patients who had undergone this procedure were examined to assess postoperative sensation, temporomandibular joint function, dental occlusion, and cosmesis. RESULTS: All patients had some sequelae but these were minor in nature. Nine of 14 patients had abnormal postoperative sensation, 8 of 14 patients had symptoms of TMJ abnormality, 11 of 14 patients were noted with a changed occlusion, but 71.4% patients had relatively good cosmetic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although most sequelae are negligible and further treatment is not required, patients who have undergone midline mandibulotomy can expect to experience one or more relatively minor long-term functional sequelae. To minimize this problem, meticulous surgical repair and aggressive postoperative physical therapy are required.

Mandibulotomy, A Surgical approach for Oral cancer: Its Complications and contributing factors

We reviewed 56 patients who received mandibulotomy at Yonsei medical center between 1989 and 1999. We also analysed the complications associated with mandibulotomy and its contributing factors. The complications occur in 16 patients(28.6%) and are classified into two categories; intraoperative and postperative complications. Nonunion was observed in 5 patients and osteoradionecrosis in 5. The patients who received preoperative radiation therapy were more tend to develop nonunion and osteoradionecrosis. This study suggests the benefits of mandibulotomy as a surgical approach to oral cancer: 1. Paramedian osteotomy was recommended for preservation of neurovascular bundle and ease of surgical access. 2. By using thin saw blade, reapproximation was improved with minimal bone loss. 3. osteotomy on anterior mandible which lies outside the usual portals of radiation therapy decreases the incidence of osteoradionecrosis.

Mandibulotomy for The Approach to The Oral Cavity, Oropharynx and Skull Base / 대한이비인후과학회지

BACKGROUND: Adequate exposure of skull base lesion and intraoral lesion occupying the posterior oral cavity, base of tongue, tonsil, superior hypopharynx, anterior skull base, and infratemporal space for wide-field primary surgical resection is critical to tumor ablation. The division of mandible for resection of tumor was first undertaken by Roux in 1836, and many studies renewed the interest of mandible sparing procedure for surgical treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma. OBJECTIVES: Mandibular swing approach for gaining access to oral cavity, oropharynx, and skull base for excision of tumor, provides excellent exposure with low complication rate when there is intervening grossly normal tissue between the tumor and bone. We studied mandibular swing approach with our surgical experience, with special emphasis on its subtypes related to osteotomy sites and forms. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The records of 20 patients underwent mandibular swing approach at Hanyang University Hospital, were studied by chart review. The patients were retrospectively reviewed to assess age, sex, tumor site origin, stage of disease, types of neck dissection and methods of the reconstruction, types of the mandibular osteotomies, and difference of complication rates between symphyseal and parasymphyseal osteotomy. RESULTS: Post-operative complications occured in 6 patients(30%). But osteotomy related complication rate was 15%. Complications of osteotomy site occurred at a rate of 20% in the symphyseal osteotomy group, but no complications arose in parasymphyseal osteotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that, if the mandible is clinically and radiologically clear of malignant involvement, midline mandibulotomy is more feasible surgical approach method for treatment of oral cavity, oropharyngeal, skull base lesion.